Skip to content

The Corrective Action Workflow

Corrective actions — sometimes called CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions) — are the tasks you raise to eliminate or control hazards, respond to incidents, and prevent recurrence. Getting the workflow right is central to an effective safety management system.

Open → In Progress → Completed → Verified

This four-stage flow is intentional and maps to real-world accountability:

StageWho sets itWhat it means
OpenSystem (on creation)Action exists and is assigned; work not yet started
In ProgressAssigneeAssignee is actively working on the action
CompletedAssigneeAssignee believes the work is done
VerifiedAdmin or Owner onlyA second person has confirmed the work is truly complete and effective

Many organisations use a simple Open/Closed workflow. SteadyOn uses four stages because:

Completion and verification are different things. When a worker marks an action as Completed, they are saying “I’ve done the work.” When an Admin marks it as Verified, they are saying “I’ve checked the work and confirm it is effective.” This two-person sign-off is a key control in any quality or safety management system — it prevents actions from being closed out without anyone actually checking the outcome.

In Progress is useful for planning. Knowing which actions are actively being worked on (versus assigned but not started) helps managers prioritise their follow-up conversations.


Actions can be created in three ways, each leaving a link back to the source:

Raising an action from a hazard creates a link so you can see all the control tasks associated with that hazard. When you view the hazard detail page, all linked actions appear below with their current status.

Raising an action from an incident creates the investigation-to-action link. This is important for demonstrating to a regulator that you not only recorded the incident, but took concrete steps to prevent recurrence.

Some actions do not stem from a specific hazard or incident — for example, scheduling a plant maintenance service or procuring new PPE. These are created directly in the Actions module with source type Manual.


When you create an action, you classify it using the hierarchy of controls — a globally recognised framework for the relative effectiveness of different control types:

LevelControl TypeExampleEffectiveness
1EliminateRemove the chemicalHighest
2SubstituteReplace with a safer alternativeHigh
3IsolateInstall machine guardingHigh
4EngineeringImprove ventilationMedium
5AdministrativeWrite a new procedureMedium
6PPEProvide gloves and gogglesLowest

The hierarchy matters because controls higher up the list are more reliable. PPE can fail; engineering controls generally cannot. When raising actions, aim for the highest practical control type.


PriorityIntended use
ImmediateMust be done today or within 24 hours — life-safety risk
Short-termWithin 1–4 weeks — significant risk that cannot wait
Long-termWithin 1–6 months — improvement or lower-priority control

These are labels to guide urgency. The actual due date you set is what drives the BRAG status.


A well-written corrective action should be:

  • SpecificInstall anti-slip tiles throughout kitchen (20m²) not Fix the floor
  • Measurable — you can check whether it is done
  • Assigned — one named person is responsible, not a team or role
  • Time-bound — has a realistic due date
  • Linked — connected to the hazard or incident that raised it

Vague actions — Review safety procedures or Improve training — are hard to close out and easy to forget. Be specific enough that the assignee knows exactly what to do and you know exactly what to check.


An action becomes overdue when its due date passes and it is not yet Completed or Verified. Overdue actions:

  • Turn Red BRAG immediately
  • Appear in the Overdue section at the top of the Actions list
  • Appear in Today’s Focus on the dashboard

If an action cannot be done by its due date, update the due date with a realistic new date and add a note explaining why. Do not leave actions sitting overdue without explanation — this is the pattern that leads to regulatory findings.